ALERTS: PROCEDURES - FRANCE - FOOD – COMPETENCE - EXCESSIVE PRICES - ANNULMENT

Competence: The French Competition Authority refuses to know about practices implemented in French Polynesia by opposing its territorial competence and especially its attribution competence, even after the admission of the request for legitimate suspicion against the Polynesian Competition Authority (Wane)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. We remember that, in the saga of excessive tariffs on the market for the supply of beverages to shops organized under brand names in French Polynesia, the first president of the Paris Court of Appeal, taking note of theruling of 4 June 2020 to which the Second Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation had ruled that the independent administrative authorities which impose sanctions are subject to an ex ante control of their impartiality and may be subject to proceedings for legitimate suspicion, had been upheld, under the terms of an order issued on 29 July 2020The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance, on an application for legitimate suspicion

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Competence: The French Competition Authority refuses to know about practices implemented in French Polynesia by opposing its territorial competence and especially its attribution competence, even after the admission of the request for legitimate suspicion against the Polynesian Competition Authority (Wane), 18 November 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 97998, www.concurrences.com

Visites 125

All reviews