ALERTS: CARTELS - EUROPEAN UNION - COMMITMENTS - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - ENTERTAINMENT - LICENCE - PROPORTIONALITY PRINCIPLE - ANNULMENT

Commitments: The General Court of Justice of the European Union considers that the Court of First Instance of the European Union failed to take proper account of the interests of third parties and infringed the principle of proportionality in a case concerning cross-border access to pay-TV (Canal+)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 9 December 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down its judgment in case C-132/19 (Canal+ Group v. Commission).. It will be remembered that on 12 December 2018, the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered a judgment in case T-873/16 (Canal+ Group v. Commission) https://lactu-concurrence.us14.list...in favor of which it dismissed the action brought by Canal+ Group for the annulment of the decision of the Commission of July 26, 2016. under which the Commission had accepted and made binding the commitments entered into by the US studio Paramount in relation to the film content licensing agreements which the US studio

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Commitments: The General Court of Justice of the European Union considers that the Court of First Instance of the European Union failed to take proper account of the interests of third parties and infringed the principle of proportionality in a case concerning cross-border access to pay-TV (Canal+), 9 December 2020, Concurrences N° 1-2021, Art. N° 98347, www.concurrences.com

Visites 280

All reviews