*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a judgment delivered on 16 September 2020In a decision handed down on June 8, 2018, the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation once again censured the Paris Court of Appeal in the case of access to the fixed telephony market for secondary residences, following a so-called "stand alone" action, i.e. an action that did not follow the previous decision adopted by a competition authority. 51.38 million in damages to SFR for having abused its dominant position by not allowing its competitor to replicate the interruptible telephony offer intended for owners of second homes that it has been offering them since 2006. This offer allows them to benefit
ALERTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - FRANCE - MARKET ACCESS - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION
Abuse of dominant position: The French Supreme Court once again censors the Paris Court of Appeal in the case of access to the fixed telephony market for second homes (Orange / SFR)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.