*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 16 September 2020, the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation handed down its ruling https://lactu-concurrence.us14.list... in the case of practices implemented by TDF to prevent the installation of competing pylons. It rejects all the pleas raised in the main appeal brought by TDF, but also the sole plea in the cross-appeal brought by the Competition Authority. It confirms in all respects the judgment delivered on 21 December 2017. by the Paris Court of Appeals in this case. Taking the view that the complaint of disparagement upheld by the Competition Authority had not been established, the Paris Court of Appeal had reduced the fine imposed on
ALERTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - FRANCE - REJECTION - FINES - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - LOYALTY REBATES
Abuse of dominant position: The French Supreme Court confirms in all respects the conclusions of the Court of Appeal concerning practices implemented by an infrastructure operator in the digital and audiovisual sector to prevent the installation of competing towers (TDF)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.