LEGAL PRACTICE: PROCEDURES - SANCTIONS - COMPENSATION - JURISDICTION - HARM - INQUIRIES - PRESCRIPTION

Private enforcement of antitrust law in France (June 2019 – Nov. 2019)

This new period is less rich in “big” decisions than the previous one, which had no less than three judgments from the Court of Justice of the European Union, but it is marked by several atypical decisions that may announce a diversification of litigation. Recurring questions also continue to pose challenges, such as those related to period of limitations, jurisdiction and access to documents.

Sélection de décisions rendues dans la période sous commentaire. Les décisions commentées sont marquées d’un astérisque, les autres sont simplement citées pour information et il est fait brièvement état de leur intérêt. CJUE, 6e ch., 29 juill. 2019, Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft c/ DAF Trucks NV, aff. C‑451/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:635 * CE, ch. 2-7, 22 nov. 2019, SNCF Mobilités, req. 418645, ECLI:FR:CECHR:2019:418645.20191122* CAA Paris, 4e ch., 13 juin 2019, SNCF Mobilités, req. 14PA02419* CA Paris, ch. 5-4, 30 août 2019, SAS Coty c/ SA Brandalley, RG 18/20739 CA Paris, ch. 1-8, 25 oct. 2019, Société X Y c/ Société Renault Trucks, RG 19/05356* CA Paris, ch. 5-4, 31 juill. 2019, SARL BMC c/ SA Boulangerie Tradition Biotechnologie, RG 16/08280 TGI Rennes, 2e civ., 7 oct. 2019, Fédération régionale des

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Université de Caen Basse-Normandie
  • Cabinet Racine (Paris)

Quotation

Rafael P. Amaro, Bastien Thomas, Private enforcement of antitrust law in France (June 2019 – Nov. 2019), February 2020, Concurrences Review N° 1-2020, Art. N° 92969, pp. 218-232

Visites 153

All reviews