CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION – FRANCE – FRANCHISE - NON-COMPETE OBLIGATION

Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal rules that a post-contractual non-compete clause applicable for one year within a radius of 150 kilometres around the previously operated point of sale is disproportionate (Educinvest / Sud-Ouest Campus)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Paris Court of Appel, Dec. 13th, 2019, Educinvest vs. Sud-Ouest Campus, RG n° 19/02615

Rendu sur renvoi après cassation (Cass. com., 28 nov. 2018, n° 17-18.619), l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de Paris du 13 décembre 2019 avait notamment à se prononcer sur la validité d’une clause de non-concurrence post contractuelle prévue par un franchiseur du secteur de l’éducation. Au titre de deux contrats conclus pour une durée de 10 ans, le franchisé avait obtenu

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Nicolas Éréséo, Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal rules that a post-contractual non-compete clause applicable for one year within a radius of 150 kilometres around the previously operated point of sale is disproportionate (Educinvest / Sud-Ouest Campus), 13 December 2019, Concurrences Review N° 1-2020, Art. N° 93328, p. 102

Visites 42

All reviews