CASE COMMENTS: REGULATIONS – FRANCE - BROADCASTING – SANCTIONS – LIABILITY

Broadcasting: The French Administrative Supreme Court illustrates the legal consequences of the transformation of the regulatory authority into an independent public authority by ruling on actions launched by a television channel operator for the compensation of damages suffered because of the alleged or actual invalidity of sanctions decided by the French Audiovisual Council (C8)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Two decisions handed down on November 13, 2019 by the Conseil d'État in disputes between C8, formerly Direct 8 then D8, and the Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (CSA) illustrate the legal consequences, in terms of the liability of regulatory authorities, of the legislative qualification of an independent public authority (API) and the simultaneous recognition of a legal personality to the authority concerned. Reminder of previous episodes It does not seem necessary to present here the television program entitled "Touche pas à mon poste" presented by Cyril Hanouna for almost ten years and broadcast today on channel C8. This early evening - and therefore

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Emmanuel Guillaume, Rémi Ducloyer, Broadcasting: The French Administrative Supreme Court illustrates the legal consequences of the transformation of the regulatory authority into an independent public authority by ruling on actions launched by a television channel operator for the compensation of damages suffered because of the alleged or actual invalidity of sanctions decided by the French Audiovisual Council (C8), 13 November 2019, Concurrences N° 1-2020, Art. N° 93396, pp. 170-171

Visites 197

All reviews