CASE COMMENTS: EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW – UNITED-STATES – PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT – CONSPIRACY – BOYCOTT

The U.S.: The Southern District Court of New York dismisses an artist’s complaint accusing five museums of collective Boycott (Cenedella / Metropolitan Museum of Art )

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In Europe, the art market and antitrust form a rarely solicited couple. The situation is different in the United States, where there are a handful of cases in which this particular market is analysed from the point of view of competition law rules. Such is the case of a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cenedella v. Metropolitan Museum of Art, S.D.N.Y., 19 Dec. 2018, No. 18 CIV. 1029, JGK). The case involved an artist who sought to bring a class action against five New York museums, alleging that they had violated the Sherman Act and the Donnelly Act by agreeing to exclude his works from the New York

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Christophe Roda, The U.S.: The Southern District Court of New York dismisses an artist’s complaint accusing five museums of collective Boycott (Cenedella / Metropolitan Museum of Art ), 19 December 2018, Concurrences N° 1-2019, Art. N° 89442, pp. 219-222

Visites 244

All reviews