CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION – REGULATED PROFESSION – UNLAWFUL PRACTICE

Unlawful practice: The Paris Court of Appeal condemns a franchisor and its franchisee to pay damages to a competitor for illegally practicing medical acts (Centre Laser Médical Lyon / Mme. C., All Sens, Depil Tech)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. A franchisee had entered into a franchise agreement with a company that had developed a concept of pulsed light hair removal treatments. He was being sued by a competitor of the franchisor for acts of unfair competition due to the illegal practice of medicine. The Paris Court of Appeal, relying on article 2 of the decree of 6 January 1962, as amended by the decree of 13 April

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Dominique Ferré, Unlawful practice: The Paris Court of Appeal condemns a franchisor and its franchisee to pay damages to a competitor for illegally practicing medical acts (Centre Laser Médical Lyon / Mme. C., All Sens, Depil Tech), 7 September 2018, Concurrences N° 1-2019, Art. N° 89503, pp. 104-105

Visites 140

All reviews