CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – LAWFULNESS – BREACH

Lawfulness: The Paris Court of Appeal examines the conformity of a non-competition clause with regard to Community law and internal law (P2M Shoes / Besson Chaussures)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In November 2004, Besson Chaussures entered into a contract with P2M Shoes under which it entrusted the latter with the operation of a business for the sale of footwear, textiles and accessories. A new contract - a management contract for an indefinite period - was signed in September 2008, under which P2M Shoes (managing agent) was then entrusted with the management of the business. It should be noted that the contract contains in particular two clauses relating to the termination of the contractual relationship. Article 3.5.2 stipulates firstly, for the benefit of both parties, a right of unilateral termination as well as a minimum notice

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne/Mer)

Quotation

Valérie Durand, Lawfulness: The Paris Court of Appeal examines the conformity of a non-competition clause with regard to Community law and internal law (P2M Shoes / Besson Chaussures), 12 December 2018, Concurrences N° 1-2019, Art. N° 89452, pp. 114-115

Visites 261

All reviews