CASE COMMENTS: PROCEDURES – FRANCE – “RE-OPENED” JUDGMENT – FLOUR CASE

“Re-opened” judgment: The French Supreme Court comes back on its judgment delivered by its commercial chamber on Nov. 8th 2016 in the flour case due to a mistake non imputable to parties (Axiane meunerie)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On October 4, 2017, on referral of its own motion, the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation issued a so-called "de rabat" ruling, in which it reversed a previous ruling, issued on November 8, 2016, in that it contains a procedural error not attributable to the parties in question which, without affecting the legal analysis, had an

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
  • Ashurst (Paris)

Quotation

Christophe Lemaire, Simon Naudin, “Re-opened” judgment: The French Supreme Court comes back on its judgment delivered by its commercial chamber on Nov. 8th 2016 in the flour case due to a mistake non imputable to parties (Axiane meunerie), 4 October 2017, Concurrences N° 1-2018, Art. N° 86253, p. 165

Visites 665

All reviews