CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - SUDDEN TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIP - BANK LOANS - SCOPE OF THE ARTICLE L. 442-6 OF THE COMMERCIAL CODE

Bank loans: The French Supreme Court decides that the provisions of article L. 442-6 of the Commercial Code do not apply to termination of bank loans (AMG Compagnie / CIC)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The commented judgment is important (obs. C. Mouly-Guillemaud, Lettre distr. nov. 2017; note N. Dissaux, JCP E 2017, 1665; chron. F. Buy, RLDC Jan. 2018, forthcoming). It constitutes a new illustration of the current "ebb" of article L. 442-6 C. com (Flux et reflux de la rupture brutale d'une relation commerciale établie, ed. C. Mouly-Guillemaud, LexisNexis, 2018, to be published). The question was: does the law on abrupt terminations apply in the event of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Aix-Marseille

Quotation

Frédéric Buy, Bank loans: The French Supreme Court decides that the provisions of article L. 442-6 of the Commercial Code do not apply to termination of bank loans (AMG Compagnie / CIC), 25 October 2017, Concurrences N° 1-2018, Art. N° 86184, pp. 114-115

Visites 169

All reviews