CASE COMMENTS : UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES – TRANSPARENCE AND RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SUDDEN TERMINATION

Forseeable termination : The French Supreme Court rules that a foreseeable contract termination is not sudden and does not give rise to damages (Seraphin / Louis Vuitton Malletier)

KEYWORDS
Reference

French Supreme Court, Com., Nov. 22nd, 2016, Seraphin c/ Louis Vuitton Malletier, n° 15-15796

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Mary-Claude Mitchell, Forseeable termination : The French Supreme Court rules that a foreseeable contract termination is not sudden and does not give rise to damages (Seraphin / Louis Vuitton Malletier), 22 November 2016, Concurrences N° 1-2017, Art. N° 83387, pp. 126

Visites 130

All reviews