CASE COMMENTS : UNILATERAL PRACTICES – EUROPEAN UNION – EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICES – OPINION

Fidelity Rebates : Advocate General Wahl considers that appeal against the imposition of a €1.06 billion fine on a manufacturer of microelectronic devices for abuse of its dominant position should be upheld (Intel)

KEYWORDS
Reference

CJEU, Op. AG, Oct. 20th 2016, Intel, Case C-413/14

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Advocate General Wahl delivered his Opinion on 20 October 2016 in Intel v

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Anne Wachsmann, Nicolas Zacharie, Fidelity Rebates : Advocate General Wahl considers that appeal against the imposition of a €1.06 billion fine on a manufacturer of microelectronic devices for abuse of its dominant position should be upheld (Intel), 20 October 2016, Concurrences N° 1-2017, Art. N° 83324, pp. 104

Visites 234

All reviews