CASE COMMENTS : UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES – TRANSPARENCE AND RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE

Submission : The French Supreme Court approves the judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal that ruled against a large retailer for submitting or having attempted to submit its suppliers to significant imbalance (Carrefour)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. This is the latest episode in the fight, for the moment victorious, led by the Minister of the Economy against the players in the mass distribution sector. In a ruling handed down on 4 October 2016 (CCC 2016, comm. 253, obs. N. Mathey; blog Vogel & Vogel), the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation approved the decision to sentence the companies of the Carrefour group that had been accused of having subjected or attempted to subject network suppliers to obligations creating a significant imbalance due to certain clauses (art. L. 442-6, I, 2°, C. com; on this text, F. Buy and J. Heinich, "Le déséquilibre significatif entre les droits et obligations

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Aix-Marseille

Quotation

Frédéric Buy, Submission : The French Supreme Court approves the judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal that ruled against a large retailer for submitting or having attempted to submit its suppliers to significant imbalance (Carrefour), 4 October 2016, Concurrences N° 1-2017, Art. N° 83381, pp. 122-123

Visites 558

All reviews