ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION - REFUSAL OF AUTHORISATION - RELEVANT MARKET - DISCRIMINATION

Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal recognises the legality of a refusal of authorisation (Elysée Shopping/Rolex)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Thejudgment handed down on 19 October 2016 by the Paris Court of Appeal, seized by a trader who had unsuccessfully applied for integration into a qualitative selective distribution network set up by a manufacturer of prestige watchmaking products, will undoubtedly attract attention. This is all the more true since the use of this distribution method seems to have developed in recent times, sometimes (often?) as a means of thwarting the online marketing of products. Moreover, the same training course gave, on 25 May and June 29th https://groupes.renater.fr/sympa/d_... 2016, two high-profile judgments in which the organiser of a selective distribution

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal recognises the legality of a refusal of authorisation (Elysée Shopping/Rolex), 19 October 2016, Concurrences N° 1-2017, Art. N° 83204, www.concurrences.com

Visites 341

All reviews