ALERT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - PRICING POLICY - EXCLUSION - PRIOR INFRINGEMENT - APPEAL - FINE

Rail freight: The French Judiciary Supreme Court condemns the Paris Court of Appeal’s restrictive approach of prior infringements and reverses its decision finding no abuse of dominant position (SNCF/ECR)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. By way of a ruling http://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.... handed down on 22 November 2016, the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation invalidated theruling on two essential points delivered on 6 November 2014 in the rail freight case, in which the Paris Court of Appeal partially reversed the decision http://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.... No. 12-D-25 of 18 December 2012, described by its author himself - the Competition Authority - as "structuring for the rail freight sector". It will be remembered that, despite the finding of abuse of a dominant position through the implementation of a predatory pricing practice, the Competition Authority had

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Rail freight: The French Judiciary Supreme Court condemns the Paris Court of Appeal’s restrictive approach of prior infringements and reverses its decision finding no abuse of dominant position (SNCF/ECR), 22 November 2016, Concurrences N° 1-2017, Art. N° 83220, www.concurrences.com

Visites 285

All reviews