*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 13 December the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered a judgment in Case T-95/15 (Printeos and Others v Commission). in many respects salutary in Case T-95/15 (Printeos and Others v Commission). In that decision, the Court, by annulling Article 2 (setting out the penalties imposed on the applicants) of the decision, orders that of 10 December 2014, the Commission's failure to state reasons for the Commission's failure to state reasons for the calculation of the various penalties imposed on five undertakings in the context of a settlement procedure. It will be recalled that in this case, the European Commission imposed a total fine of
ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - SETTLEMENT - COORDINATION OF SALES PRICES AND ALLOCATION OF CUSTOMERS - FINE - EQUAL TREATMENT - OBLIGATION TO STATE REASONS - RIGHTS OF DEFENCE
Obligation to state reasons: The General Court of the European Union reminds the Commission of its obligation to enable parties to appreciate the legality of a settlement decision and annuls partially the Commission’s decision in the stock/catalogue and special printed envelopes market case (Printeos)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.