ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - SETTLEMENT - COORDINATION OF SALES PRICES AND ALLOCATION OF CUSTOMERS - FINE - EQUAL TREATMENT - OBLIGATION TO STATE REASONS - RIGHTS OF DEFENCE

Obligation to state reasons: The General Court of the European Union reminds the Commission of its obligation to enable parties to appreciate the legality of a settlement decision and annuls partially the Commission’s decision in the stock/catalogue and special printed envelopes market case (Printeos)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 13 December the Court of First Instance of the European Union delivered a judgment in Case T-95/15 (Printeos and Others v Commission). in many respects salutary in Case T-95/15 (Printeos and Others v Commission). In that decision, the Court, by annulling Article 2 (setting out the penalties imposed on the applicants) of the decision, orders that of 10 December 2014, the Commission's failure to state reasons for the Commission's failure to state reasons for the calculation of the various penalties imposed on five undertakings in the context of a settlement procedure. It will be recalled that in this case, the European Commission imposed a total fine of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Obligation to state reasons: The General Court of the European Union reminds the Commission of its obligation to enable parties to appreciate the legality of a settlement decision and annuls partially the Commission’s decision in the stock/catalogue and special printed envelopes market case (Printeos), 13 December 2016, Concurrences N° 1-2017, Art. N° 83236, www.concurrences.com

Visites 374

All reviews