ALERT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE - EXCLUSIVITY - ABRUPT AND ABUSIVE TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONS - APPEAL

Abrupt and abusive termination of commercial relations: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects a complaint for abusive termination and significant imbalance on that notice of the end of exclusivity had been given (Nadal/Agco)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The rule relating to the abrupt termination of established commercial relations is still undergoing legal developments, confirming decision after decision the success in litigation of Article L. 442-6-I-5° of the Commercial Code, introduced into French law by the Act of 1 July 1996. In a stop https://groupes.renater.fr/sympa/d_... of 7 November 2016, the Paris Court of Appeal heard the case of the breach of a fixed-term agricultural concession contract, which was initiated by the grantor and which was contested despite a two-year notice period. More than the solution in itself adopted by the Court, concluding, like the first judges, that such notice was

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Abrupt and abusive termination of commercial relations: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects a complaint for abusive termination and significant imbalance on that notice of the end of exclusivity had been given (Nadal/Agco), 7 November 2016, Concurrences N° 1-2017, Art. N° 83212, www.concurrences.com

Visites 168

All reviews