CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – DOMINANT POSITION – NO SUDDEN TERMINATION

Sudden termination: The Paris Court of Appeal refuses the sudden termination request of a distribution company not dominating the market considering that the absence of an agreement on the next commercial conditions authorized the parties to disengage prior notice as specified in the contract (Maisoning Eco Habitat / Castorama)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Sudden termination: The Paris Court of Appeal refuses the sudden termination request of a distribution company not dominating the market considering that the absence of an agreement on the next commercial conditions authorized the parties to disengage prior notice as specified in the contract (Maisoning Eco Habitat / Castorama), 17 December 2015, Concurrences N° 1-2016, Art. N° 77429, p. 126

Visites 166

All reviews