CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION – PRICES (NOT) ORIENTED TOWARDS COSTS

Excessive prices: The French Competition Authority holds that excessive price differentiation between off net and on net calls constitutes an abuse

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Regular readers of this column will have developed, since 2009, a certain familiarity with the mobile telephony market in the French overseas departments and territories, which has given rise to a fairly large number of decisions (Decision No. 09-MC-02 of 16 September 2009 on protective measures, obs. ALSobs. AR Decision No. 12-D-05 of 24 January 2012 on compliance with the injunction, obs. SLA45 million, followed by a decision on the merits, Decision No 14-D-05 ordering SFR to pay a fine of EUR 45 million, obs. FM, AR Abus de position dominante : L'Autorité de la concurrence sanctionne des pratiques de différenciation tarifaire abusive entre appels ou SMS

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Catholic University of Louvain

Quotation

Anne-Lise Sibony, Excessive prices: The French Competition Authority holds that excessive price differentiation between off net and on net calls constitutes an abuse, 30 November 2015, Concurrences N° 1-2016, Art. N° 77486, p. 105

Visites 237

All reviews