ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - ABUSE OF ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY - DISTRIBUTION - APPEAL - INTERIM MEASURES

Interim measures: The Paris Court of appeal rejects two appeals by an independant retailer against decisions relating to practices in the sector of electronic goods distribution (Concurrence / Samsung / Panasonic)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, 3 December 2015, Judgment No. 2015/13861(Competition/Samsung) and 2014/18125 (Competition/Panasonic) On December 3, 2015, the Paris Court of Appeal handed down two judgments in the case of practices denounced by Jean Chapelle of the company Concurrence in the distribution of brown goods, in particular televisions. In the first rulingThe Court dismisses the action brought by the company Concurrence against Decision No 14-D-07 at the end of which the Authority rejected, on the one hand, the application for interim measures by the Competition company and, on the other hand, referred the matter to it on the merits, except in respect of one of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Interim measures: The Paris Court of appeal rejects two appeals by an independant retailer against decisions relating to practices in the sector of electronic goods distribution (Concurrence / Samsung / Panasonic), 3 December 2015, Concurrences N° 1-2016, Art. N° 78059, www.concurrences.com

Visites 156

All reviews