ALERT: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICE - PRICE-FIXING - INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN PARALLEL JUDGMENTS OF THE GENERAL COURT - FINES - GRAVITY OF THE INFRINGEMENT - NON-DISCRIMINATION

Statement of reasons : Advocate General Melchior Wathelet invites the Court to sanction the Tribunal’s inconsistencies between parallel judgements and to remind the Tribunal that an infringement of lesser gravity must result in a lesser fine (Keramag Keramische Werke/Duravit/Villeroy & Boch/Roca Sanitario)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CJEU, Advocate General, 26 November 2015, Opinion in Cases C-613/13 (Keramag Keramische Werke), C-609/13 (Duravit), C-625/13 (Villeroy & Boch), C-636/13 (Roca Sanitario) and C-644/13 (Villeroy & Boch) On 26 November 2015, Advocate General Melchior Wathelet delivered his Opinion. in Cases C-613/13 (European Commission v Keramag Keramische Werke GmbH and Others), C-609/13 (Duravit AG and Others v European Commission), C-625/13 (Villeroy & Boch AG v European Commission), C-636/13 (Roca Sanitario SA v European Commission) and C-644/13 (Villeroy & Boch SAS v European Commission) It will be remembered that, under a decision rendered on June 23,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Statement of reasons : Advocate General Melchior Wathelet invites the Court to sanction the Tribunal’s inconsistencies between parallel judgements and to remind the Tribunal that an infringement of lesser gravity must result in a lesser fine (Keramag Keramische Werke/Duravit/Villeroy & Boch/Roca Sanitario), 26 November 2015, Concurrences N° 1-2016, Art. N° 78106, www.concurrences.com

Visites 113

All reviews