A ALERT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION - DISPARAGEMENT - FINE - CALCULATION - GEOGRAPHICAL MARKET

Disparagement: The Paris Court of appeals confirms the practices observed on the dairy products market in Martinique, but lowers the fine imposed on several companies because of the complexity and uncertainty around rules for expiry dates (SNYL/Socrema/Antilles Glaces)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, 24 September 2015, judgment no. 2014/16108 (SNYL/Socrema/Antilles Glaces) On 13 October 2015, the Competition Authority published online a judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in the case of of the Paris Court of Appeal dated September 24, 2015. In this decision, the Court confirmed all of the findings made by the Authority under the terms of Decision No. 14-D-08 of July 24, 2014.The Court of First Instance of the European Communities, in which it had sanctioned Société Nouvelle des Yaourts de Littée (SNYL) and its parent companies Socrema and Antilles Glaces, for abusing their dominant position on the market for

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Disparagement: The Paris Court of appeals confirms the practices observed on the dairy products market in Martinique, but lowers the fine imposed on several companies because of the complexity and uncertainty around rules for expiry dates (SNYL/Socrema/Antilles Glaces), 24 September 2015, Concurrences N° 1-2016, Art. N° 78065, www.concurrences.com

Visites 155

All reviews