CASE COMMENTS : UNILATERAL PRACTICES – ABUSE OF DOMINANCE – UNLIMITED JURISDICTION - SANCTIONS - TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Abuse of dominance : The Advocate General Wathelet suggests to send a case related to the abuse of dominance back to the General Court so that the amount of the fine be fully examined (Telefonica)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Opinion of the Advocate general Wathelet, 26.09.2013, Telefonica, aff. C-295/12 P

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In 2003, Wanadoo Espana SL filed a complaint with the Commission against Telefonica alleging abuse of its dominant position. According to Wanadoo, the margin

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Catholic University of Louvain
    Belgium 94 contributions 133293 visits

Quotation

Anne-Lise Sibony, Abuse of dominance : The Advocate General Wathelet suggests to send a case related to the abuse of dominance back to the General Court so that the amount of the fine be fully examined (Telefonica), 26 September 2013, Concurrences N° 1-2014, Art. N° 63638, pp. 66-67

Visites 150

All reviews