*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In addition to the question of reasonable time (see this column, supra), the judgment of 11 October 2012 in the Historic Monuments case gave the Paris Court of Appeal the opportunity to rule on two other procedural points, one relating to the rules of limitation and the other to the communication to the Authority of documents from the criminal case. The Court of Appeal rejects the immediate application of the ten-year statute of limitations introduced by the LME law. With regard to the statute of limitations, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled out the immediate application of the ten-year statute of limitations introduced byOrder 2008-1161 of 13 November
CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURE – TEN-YEAR TIME LIMIT – INTERRUPTION OF THE TIME LIMIT – ACCES AND COMMUNICATION OF EVIDENCE FROM CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Interruption of the time limit: The Paris Court of Appeal dismisses the immediate application of the ten-year time limit introduce by the LME Act and confirms the substantial latitude of the FCA for access to and use of evidence from the criminal procedure (Chevalier Nord)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.