Interim measures: The General Court dismisses application for interim measures for lack of urgency, without it being necessary to consider whether the other conditions for granting the interim measures sought are fulfilled in this case (EDF)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Orderly. President Trib. UE, 11 Oct. 2012 aff. T-389/12 R, EDF v. Commission By its decision of 12 November 2009 (Case COMP/M. 5549 EDF v Segebel), the Commission had, in its decision of 12 November 2009 (Case COMP/M. 5549 EDF v Segebel) authorised on the basis of Article 6(1)(b) and (2) of Council Regulation No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 (hereinafter the 'basic Regulation'), the concentration relating to the acquisition by EDF of sole control of the assets of the Belgian undertaking Segebel. This authorisation was, however, subject to EDF complying with two commitments which it had itself proposed in order to obtain authorisation. One of these