CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENT – AGRICULTURE/FOOD PRODUCTS - CARTEL – FINE – SUSPENSION – FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES – GROUP OF COMPANIES – PAYMENT TERMS OBTAINED FROM THE TAX ADMINISTRATION

Fine - Suspension: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects a request for suspension in the flour case and clarifies the level of assessment of financial difficulties within groups of companies (Farines alimentaires)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, ch.5-7, 13 November 2012, Edible flours, RG n° 12/14436 Expected reversal of case law: the Paris Court of Appeal has returned to the conditions for assessing the manifestly excessive consequences that would result from the immediate implementation of an Authority decision in the presence of a company belonging to a group of undertakings. Last July, the First Chairman's delegate had in fact granted two undertakings a stay of execution of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Nathalie Jalabert-Doury, Fine - Suspension: The Paris Court of Appeal rejects a request for suspension in the flour case and clarifies the level of assessment of financial difficulties within groups of companies (Farines alimentaires), 13 November 2012, Concurrences N° 1-2013, Art. N° 50449, pp. 72-73

Visites 180

All reviews