CASE COMMENTS :RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE – ARTICLE L 442-6 -I 2° COMMERCIAL CODE – UNDUE REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT – EXECUTION OF A DECISION OF JUSTICE – CONVICTION TO STOP – CIVIL PENALTY – PUBLICATION
Significant imbalance: The Commercial Court of Paris ordered a distributor to stop requiring its suppliers repayment of amounts to which he was convicted by a previous lawsuit by the Minister of the Economy (Minister of the Economy/GALEC)
*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article.
23,313,681 for transactions considered to correspond to advantages without consideration (Versailles, 29 October 2009, Minister of the Economy v. GALEC, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence, 2010, No. 22; the Versailles Court of Appeal submits to the case law of the Court of Cassation), he intends not to see this decision circumvented.
However, the distributor is not reluctant to make some savings on such a large sum and its records show that letters issued by suppliers between 2004 and 2006 show that the Minister's initial action was not desired by them and that they had indicated in those letters that they did not intend to obtain
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.