CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - SPECIALIZATION - APPEAL - TEMPORAL APPLICATION

Specialization - Temporal application: The Paris Court of Appeal rules that the service of a judgment rendered before the entry into force of the principle of specialized jurisdiction indicates validly that the appellant can lodge its appeal before a non-specialized court (Buro Com/Banque Accord)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Was it necessary to adopt, for Article L. 442-6 of the Commercial Code, the same measure of specialisation of jurisdictions as that previously adopted for the law on anti-competitive practices? Beyond the questions that this choice may raise in principle, it should be noted here that the mechanism enshrined in the LME Act and implementing decree No. 2009-1384 of 11

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Specialization - Temporal application: The Paris Court of Appeal rules that the service of a judgment rendered before the entry into force of the principle of specialized jurisdiction indicates validly that the appellant can lodge its appeal before a non-specialized court (Buro Com/Banque Accord), 18 November 2010, Concurrences N° 1-2011, Art. N° 34161, p. 135

Visites 984

All reviews