CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION - EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION - TERMINATION - NOTICE - STOCKS

Exclusive distribution: The Court of Cassation holds that refusal to supply an exclusive distributor after notice termination of the contract is not a fault if he has an adequate stock to distribute until the termination (Brasserie du Pacifique/Lesieur)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, November 9, 2010, Brasserie du Pacifique v Lesieur, nº 09-15889 Interesting decision on the still sensitive issue of the treatment of the dealer's inventory at the end of the exclusive dealership contract. A plethoric but futile dispute had developed to have the concessionaire's right to take back its stocks from the licensor at the end of the contract recognized, on the grounds that the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Montpellier

Quotation

Didier Ferrier, Exclusive distribution: The Court of Cassation holds that refusal to supply an exclusive distributor after notice termination of the contract is not a fault if he has an adequate stock to distribute until the termination (Brasserie du Pacifique/Lesieur), 9 November 2010, Concurrences N° 1-2011, Art. N° 34141, pp. 119-120

Visites 1025

All reviews