*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Const. dec. no. 09-D-32 of October 26, 2009 on the practices implemented by the Photomaton company. It will be remembered that in its decision of July 3, 2008 (Cons. Conc., Dec. No. 08-D-32 of July 3, 2008, Photomaton, comm. A. Wachsmann, ConcurrencesNo. 4-2008, p. 90), the Competition Council (the "Council") had rejected the application for interim measures against Photomaton but had continued the investigation on the merits in order to determine whether the exclusivity clauses contained in the contracts for the rental of ID photo booths did not create an artificial barrier to entry and development on the market for the rental of sites for such
CASE COMMENTS : UNILATERAL PRACTICES - EXCLUSIVITY - COMMITMENTS
Exclusivity - Commitments: The French Competition Authority welcomes commitments related to exclusivity (Photomaton)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.