ALERTS : PROCEDURE - SEARCH - SEIZURE - JUDGE - AUTHORIZATION - GROUP OF COMPANIES

Search and seizure procedure : The Paris Court of Appeal holds that an equity tie between two companies cannot by itself justify a judge’s authorization of a search and seizure procedure

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Facts In order to establish competition violations committed by a parent company, a judge of freedoms and detention had authorized, pursuant to Article L. 450-4 of the Commercial Code, the Ministry of the Economy to carry out visits and seizures on the premises of a 24%-owned subsidiary. The First President of the Paris Court of Appeal overturned the authorization order. Decision "The existence of a capital link between two companies, to the exclusion of any other element, is not such

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Marie Koehler de Montblanc, Search and seizure procedure : The Paris Court of Appeal holds that an equity tie between two companies cannot by itself justify a judge’s authorization of a search and seizure procedure, 22 October 2009, Concurrences N° 1-2010, Art. N° 30608, www.concurrences.com

Visites 1811

All reviews