CASE COMMENT : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - BREACH OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS - CONDITIONS

Breach of commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation rules again on the conditions of Article L. 442-6, I, 5° of the Commercial code on breach of commercial relationships (Les Ateliers d’origine, Maupin, Piardon,...)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber, 16 December 2008, Appeal No. 07-15.589, Sté Les Ateliers d'origine v Sté Bouygues bâtiment international; Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber, 16 December 2008, Appeal No. 07-18.050, Maupin v. Sté Ubik; Court of Cassation,Commercial Chamber, 20 January 2009, Appeal No. 07-17.556, Piardon v. Sté Caisse d'épargne et de prévoyance du Val-de-France orléanais; Court of Cassation,Commercial Chamber, 2 December 2008, Appeal No. 08-10.731, Sté Castorama France v Sté Tmocani-Benetière; Court of Cassation,Commercial Chamber, 16 December 2008, Appeal No. 08-13.423, Sté Concurrence v Sté Sony France ; Paris Court of Appeal, Chamber 5,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Montpellier

Quotation

Didier Ferrier, Breach of commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation rules again on the conditions of Article L. 442-6, I, 5° of the Commercial code on breach of commercial relationships (Les Ateliers d’origine, Maupin, Piardon,...), 16 December 2008, Concurrences N° 1-2009, Art. N° 29579, www.concurrences.com

Visites 2690

All reviews