*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The decision of the Competition Council issued on October 15, 2008, and again concerning a local anti-competitive practice, comes to its attention. turn to illustrate the dangers that the seeds of danger, this time for the interest general, the upcoming micro-PAC device. The Council has just severely punish - up to the ceiling of the financial penalties which it may impose pursuant to Article L. 464-2 of the Commercial Code, i.e. 10 % of the highest year's sales for the period considered - five taxi companies, members of the artisans' union and of taxi entrepreneurs in Alpes-de-Haute-Provence (SAETAHP), as well as the union itself, for devising and
ALERTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICE - ANTICOMETITIVE AGREEMENT
Anticompetitive agreement: The French Competition Council strictly sanctions an anticompetitive agreement on the taxi market in Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, in two cases showing the danger for other companies and for public interest of the repressive system of minor anticompetitive practices
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.