CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - IMPOSITION OF FINES WHERE UNDERTAKINGS SUCCEED EACH OTHER - PRINCIPAL OF PERSONAL RESPONSABILITY - PRELIMINARY RULING

Fine - Personal responsibility: The ECJ interprets the principal of personal responsibility in order to protect the effectiveness of the rules in the sphere of competition (Ente Tabacchi Italiani - ETI)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. ECJ, 11 December 2007, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v. Ente Tabacchi italiani - ETI SpA, case C-280/06 Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Consiglio di Stato (Italy), for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court, on the question what criteria are to be applied, under Article 81 EC et seq. and, where appropriate, any other relevant rules of Community law, in determining which undertaking is to be penalised for infringement of the competition rules in the event of succession of undertakings, in particular where the final part of such an infringement has been

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Fine - Personal responsibility: The ECJ interprets the principal of personal responsibility in order to protect the effectiveness of the rules in the sphere of competition (Ente Tabacchi Italiani - ETI), 11 December 2007, Concurrences N° 1-2008, Art. N° 15254, p. 165

Visites 5844

All reviews