Statement of objections: The CFI holds that the content of the SO may remain schematic, but the decision must, when it steps aside from standard practice, indicate the turnover taken into consideration to verify the respect of the 10% ceiling (Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 13 December 2006, FNCBV v Commission, cases T-217/03 and T-245/03. – CFI, 14 December 2006, Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG and Others v Commission, cases T-259/02 to T-264/02 and T-271/02. Especially interesting in terms of the substance of competition law, especially sanctions (see this review No. 1-2007, Cartels column, note C. S.), the judgments of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in the case of the French beef cartel (FNCBV and Others, hereinafter 'beef') and the Austrian banking cartel (Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich and Others, hereinafter 'Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich'), and the judgments of the Court of