CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURES - LITIGATION - INTERVENTION - RIGHT OF INTERVENTION - EXTENT

Intervention: The CFI is still the center of an ongoing conflict in the case-law (Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 12 December 2006, Selex Sistemi Integrati SpA v Commission, Case T-155/04. – CFI, 14 December 2006, Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission, Case T-237/02 A previous issue of this column (see ConcurrencesNo. 4-2005, p. 112, note F. Z.) provided an opportunity to point out that the question whether the intervener is entitled to put forward pleas in law different from those relied on by the party whose conclusions he supports gave rise to contrasting positions, before recently receiving an answer in the affirmative, albeit qualified, from an enlarged chamber (CFI, Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition, 15 June 2005, Regione autonoma della

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Fabien Zivy, Intervention: The CFI is still the center of an ongoing conflict in the case-law (Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau), 12 December 2006, Concurrences N° 1-2007, Art. N° 13095, p. 136

Visites 3763

All reviews