*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 12 December 2006, Selex Sistemi Integrati SpA v Commission, Case T-155/04. – CFI, 14 December 2006, Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission, Case T-237/02 A previous issue of this column (see ConcurrencesNo. 4-2005, p. 112, note F. Z.) provided an opportunity to point out that the question whether the intervener is entitled to put forward pleas in law different from those relied on by the party whose conclusions he supports gave rise to contrasting positions, before recently receiving an answer in the affirmative, albeit qualified, from an enlarged chamber (CFI, Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition, 15 June 2005, Regione autonoma della
CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURES - LITIGATION - INTERVENTION - RIGHT OF INTERVENTION - EXTENT
Intervention: The CFI is still the center of an ongoing conflict in the case-law (Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.