CASE COMMENT: COLLUSIVE PRACTICES - ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS - HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS - OLIGOPLY - EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION - MARKET SHARING - MOBILE TELEPHONY

Exchange of information: The Paris Court of Appeal fully upholds the French Competition Council’s decision (Mobile phone)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, 1st ch. H, December 12, 2006v. Council, Dec. No. 05-D-65 of November 30, 2005, Mobile Telephony It will be remembered that, following a resounding decision, the Commission had severely sanctioned an agreement between mobile telephone operators, consisting of exchanges of information and market share freezes (see Decision No. 05-D-65, of 30 November 2005, this review, No. 1-2006, p. 129, and our comm.). In a judgment of 12 December 2006, the Court approved this decision in all its provisions. First of all, the Court rejects the arguments relating to the infringement of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Paris II Panthéon‑Assas

Quotation

Emmanuelle Claudel, Exchange of information: The Paris Court of Appeal fully upholds the French Competition Council’s decision (Mobile phone), 12 December 2006, Concurrences N° 1-2007, Art. N° 12783, p. 82

Visites 4479

All reviews