CASE COMMENT: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - BREACH OF ESTABLISHED COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

Breach of long standing commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation rules on breach’s legitimacy (SFR vs HAP & ETI vs SDE)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, October 3, 2006, SFR c/ HAP, No. 04-11.956 Cass. com, 31 October 2006, ETI c/ SDE, No. 04-14.988. Most of the decisions defining the conditions for the interpretation of the concept of abrupt termination of established commercial relations have so far clarified how the established nature of commercial relations should be defined, what constitutes the fault of abrupt termination and how the length of the notice period should be assessed in the light of the circumstances of each case. On the other hand, the recent period has been marked by two judgments that are of interest in better defining the limits of this concept with regard to, on the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Mary-Claude Mitchell, Breach of long standing commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation rules on breach’s legitimacy (SFR vs HAP & ETI vs SDE), 3 October 2006, Concurrences N° 1-2007, Art. N° 13059, p. 105

Visites 4617

All reviews