Case Comment : Anticompetitive Practices - Turnover - Cartel withdrawal

Turnover threshold: The CFI rules on how to assess the turnover for the assessment of the fine (Britannia Alloys & Chemicals, Union Pigments)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 29 November 2005, Britannia Alloys & Chemicals Ltd and Others v. Commission, "Zinc Phosphate", Case T-33/02. – CFI, 29 November 2005, SNCZ

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • Rizom Legal (Paris)
    France 327 contributions 456886 visits

Quotation

Michel Debroux, Turnover threshold: The CFI rules on how to assess the turnover for the assessment of the fine (Britannia Alloys & Chemicals, Union Pigments), 29 November 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 896, pp. 134-135

Visites 4262

All reviews