CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - SCARE RESSOURCES - MONOPOLY - OBJECTIVE NECESSSITY

Scare ressources: The French Competition Council holds that the monopoly held by a religious order is justified by an objective necessity (Ile Saint-Honorat)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – Conc. conc. dec. no. 05-D-60 of November 8, 2005 concerning practices implemented by the Cistercian Congregation of the Immaculate Conception, the Planaria Society, the State and the Municipality of Cannes. Would the Council have liked to celebrate, in its own way, the hundredth anniversary of the law of separation of Church and State? The question of access to the island of Saint-Honorat, property of the Cistercian Congregation of the Immaculate Conception, and to the public maritime domain surrounding it, was at the centre of the Council's decision of 8 November 2005, which is commented on below. Is the Congregation's monopoly on serving the island,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Anne Wachsmann, Scare ressources: The French Competition Council holds that the monopoly held by a religious order is justified by an objective necessity (Ile Saint-Honorat), 8 November 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 904, pp. 137-139

Visites 4784

All reviews