CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - NON COMPETE

Non compete: The Court of Cassation imposes compensation for compliance to an illicit non-compete clause (La Fiduciaire d’Armor, Société Eismann)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – Cass. soc., October 12, 2005, Mr. X... c/ Sté La Fiduciaire d'Armor, n° 03-46.752 – Cass. soc., October 19, 2005, Mr. X... c/ Sté Eismann, n° 04-40.803 The case law on the establishment of consideration as a condition for the validity of any non-competition clause inserted in an employment

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Daniel Fasquelle, Sébastien Charrière, Non compete: The Court of Cassation imposes compensation for compliance to an illicit non-compete clause (La Fiduciaire d’Armor, Société Eismann), 12 October 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 926, pp. 152-153

Visites 5317

All reviews