CASE COMMENTS: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - VERTICAL RESTRAINTS - PRICE FIXING - GRAVITY OF INFRINGEMENT - SANCTION - TRANSACTION - REMEDIES

Vertical restraints : The Competition Coucil fines several companies for engaging in vertical price agreements (BVHE, Casino, Carrefour, SDO)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On December 20, 2005, the Competition Council made public two decisions. If, in the first, Decision No. 05-D-70 of the 19 December 2005 on practices implemented in the sector pre-recorded videotapes, it penalizes the practices of vertical price agreements implemented by BVHE (Buena Vista Home Entertainment), the exclusive distributor of the Disney videotapes for France, and by the distributors Casino and Carrefour, as well as a wholesaler, in the second - the decision No. 05-D-72 of 20 December 2005, it relates to practices implemented by the work by various laboratories in the export sector parallel trade in medicinal products - Council decides to dismiss

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Vertical restraints : The Competition Coucil fines several companies for engaging in vertical price agreements (BVHE, Casino, Carrefour, SDO), 19 December 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 55035, www.concurrences.com

Visites 127

All reviews