*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Facts A distributor specialising in sporting goods (DECATHLON) was selling products that it had had 100% manufactured by its subsidiary at a price lower than their actual purchase price. He was sued under Article L. 442-2 of the French Commercial Code for resale to loss. Convicted at first instance, he appealed to the Douai Court of Appeal. Decision "Whereas the distinction between a contract of sale and a contract of enterprise is of interest at several levels,
CASE COMMENT : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - DISTRIBUTION - RESALE AT A LOSS - GROUP OF COMPANIES - BUSINESS CONTRACT
Resale at a loss : The Douai Court of Appeal condemns the distributor who resold at a loss products manufactured by his wholly owned subsidiaries (Décathlon)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.