CHRONIQUE : PRATIQUE ANTICONCURRENTIELLE - ASSOCIATION DE CONSOMMATEURS - PRESCRIPTION - PRATIQUE CONTINUE

Continuous practice : The Competition Council refuses to condemn the bars of Evry and Montpellier while practices are not continuous

KEYWORDS
Reference

Conseil de la concurrence, 21 octobre 2005, n° 05-D-56, relative à des pratiques mises en oeuvre par le barreau d’Évry

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Competition Council, 21 October 2005, No. 05-D-57, concerning practices implemented by the Montpellier Bar Association We will see two

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)
    France 4525 contributions 1119457 visits

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Continuous practice : The Competition Council refuses to condemn the bars of Evry and Montpellier while practices are not continuous, 21 October 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 54677, www.concurences.com

Visites 66

All reviews