*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Facts A company has sued a company in the court of its location for payment of damages on the basis of Article L. 442-6-I, 5°, of the French Commercial Code, for wrongful termination of established commercial relations. The defendant then raised a plea of lack of jurisdiction in favour of the court of the place of its registered office. The judges on the merits rejected this objection. The defendant company appealed to
CASE COMMENT : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - BREAK OF AN ESTABLISHED COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIP - JURISDICTION
Break of an established commercial relationship : The French Supreme Court holds that the place of a damage does not always correspond to the corporate headquarters of the victim (Daguin)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.