CHRONIQUE : ENTENTE - DISTRIBUTION - RESTRICTIONS DES EXPORTATIONS - SECTEUR AUTOMOBILE

Agreement: The Advocate General Tizzano suggests to the Court to confirm the judgment of the General Court essentially confirming the decision of the Commission sanctioning Opel Nederland for obstructing exports of new cars

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In conclusions presented on October 25, 2005, on the Appeal brought by General Motors Nederland B.V. and Opel Nederland B.V. against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 21 October 2003 (http://minilien.com/?IxhOd92IRM), at the As we recall, the latter had reduced the fine from EUR 43 million as pronounced by the Commission in its decision of 20 September 2000 - COMP/36.653 (http://minilien.com/?iOnQtWTaqY) at 35 million against Opel following the abandonment of the complaint concerning Opel's implementation of a policy of restricting the use of supply contrary to Article 81 EC, Advocate General Tizzano Calls on the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Agreement: The Advocate General Tizzano suggests to the Court to confirm the judgment of the General Court essentially confirming the decision of the Commission sanctioning Opel Nederland for obstructing exports of new cars, 25 October 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 54620, www.concurrences.com

Visites 92

All reviews