CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - ABUS DE POSITION DOMINANTE - MONOPOLE LEGAL - SUBVENTION CROISEE

Abuse of dominant position : The Competition Council refuses to condemn the SNCF for cross-subsidy

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 6 October, the Competition Council issued a decision concerning alleged subsidy practices. competition-distorting cross-subsidies implemented by an public enterprise with a legal monopoly and using resources from its monopolistic activity to subsidize a new activity. Since Decision No. 00-D-50 of March 5, 2001 (Française des games), the Competition Council has on several occasions recalled that it is lawful, for a public undertaking which has a position dominant in a market by virtue of a statutory monopoly, to enter a or competitive markets, provided that it does not abuse its dominant position to restrict or attempt to restrict access to the market for

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Abuse of dominant position : The Competition Council refuses to condemn the SNCF for cross-subsidy , 6 October 2005, Concurrences N° 1-2006, Art. N° 54581, www.concurrences.com

Visites 228

All reviews