CASE COMMENT: REGULATORY - ENERGY - DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

Energy: The Regulatory Commission of Energy rules on six cases in 2004 (Eurotunnel, EDF, etc.)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CRE, Dec. No. 04-38-01 of 6 May 2004, Safhloa c/EDF CRE, Dec. No. 04-38-02 of 25 May 2004, RTE c/ Cerestar CRE, dec. no. 04-38-03 of 27 May 2004, SARL de la Torre v/ EDF CRE, Dec. No. 04-38-04 of June 3, 2004, Sté Pouchon Cogen c/EDF CRE, Dec. No. 04-38-05 of June 4, 2004, Clariant Huningue v/SAEML Hunélec CRE, Dec. No. 04-38-08 of July 22, 2004, JMF Immo c/EDF CA Paris, 1st ch. H, 8 June 2004, on the dispute between SARL Cogé de Kerverzet and Electricité de France (EDF) In 2004, the CRE issued only six decisions on the merits; its dispute settlement activity has even been suspended since July 2004. In addition, no decisions were handed down in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • French State Council (Paris)

Quotation

Thierry Tuot, Energy: The Regulatory Commission of Energy rules on six cases in 2004 (Eurotunnel, EDF, etc.), 8 June 2004, Concurrences N° 1-2005, Art. N° 1446, pp. 121-123

Visites 3763

All reviews